Richard Broome, Managing Director at LSBUD, shines a spotlight on a troubling paradox in the water industry: while companies are fiercely dedicated to safeguarding their workers, they seem to neglect the crucial protection of their own underground assets. This contradiction raises eyebrows and demands scrutiny. It’s clear that the industry has put in place a robust framework for on-site safety, yet when it comes to the extensive network of pipes that crisscross the UK, the same level of diligence is conspicuously absent.
The numbers tell a stark story. With over 400,000 kilometres of underground water pipes, only a meager 20 percent of water companies have registered with LSBUD’s collaborative portal. This leaves a staggering 350,000 kilometres of pipeline vulnerable to third-party strikes. It’s a baffling situation where the very infrastructure that supports the water supply remains at risk, even as the industry touts its commitment to worker safety. It’s like putting a seatbelt on a driver while leaving the car doors wide open—what’s the point?
The implications of this oversight are significant. Damage to water pipelines can lead to catastrophic service disruptions, affecting everything from local businesses to essential services like hospitals. The ripple effects of such incidents can be severe, including financial losses, reputational damage, and even environmental contamination. It’s a sobering thought that a single strike could jeopardize the health of entire communities, yet the industry still grapples with a culture that seems to downplay these risks.
One reason for this cultural disconnect lies in the depth at which water pipelines are often buried. Because they’re typically located deeper than other utilities, there’s a false sense of security among water companies. They may think, “It’s unlikely we’ll be the first to get hit,” but this mindset is dangerously shortsighted. The reality is that when excavations go awry, the consequences can be dire, regardless of the order in which assets are struck.
Data security concerns also muddy the waters. Many companies are understandably wary about sharing asset information, fearing that it may expose vulnerabilities or compromise privacy. However, modern safe digging portals have evolved to address these concerns, allowing asset owners to maintain control over their data while still fostering collaboration. It’s a classic case of needing to look beyond immediate fears to see the bigger picture.
Commercial interests further complicate matters. Water companies often have established commercial arms that sell asset data. While this is a legitimate business practice, it can inadvertently create barriers for third parties seeking to access vital information. The challenge lies in finding a balance where companies can monetize their data without putting their infrastructure at risk.
As the water industry gears up for the AMP8 period, the pressure to reconcile safety with cost is mounting. The introduction of Ofwat’s PR19 regulations has nudged companies in the right direction, but the desired impact is still lacking. What’s needed now is a commitment to collaboration, open communication, and transparency. By joining a central system, asset owners can leverage the ‘safety of the herd’ effect, ultimately benefiting everyone involved.
The water sector’s dedication to worker safety is commendable, but it must not come at the expense of critical infrastructure protection. Addressing these contradictions and embracing collaborative practices can ensure that both people and pipelines are safeguarded, paving the way for a more resilient future in the industry. The time has come for water companies to step up and take a holistic approach to safety—one that truly protects all stakeholders involved.
