In a landscape where over 70% of the population in Sub-Saharan Africa lacks access to improved drinking water, informal water providers have emerged as vital lifelines. A recent scoping review published in *Environmental Research Letters* sheds light on the intricate dynamics between these informal vendors and formal water service providers, revealing how co-production can bridge critical gaps in water service delivery.
Lead author Gina Grace Gilson, affiliated with the School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, emphasizes the urgency of understanding these relationships. “Informal water vendors are not just stopgap solutions; they play an essential role in the water supply chain, particularly in rapidly urbanizing areas where public utilities struggle to keep pace,” she notes.
The research highlights that while informal vendors often meet immediate consumer needs, the lack of coordination with formal providers can lead to inefficiencies and quality concerns. The study identifies various coordination mechanisms that could enhance water access, such as quality testing and technical assistance, which could be especially beneficial in regions heavily reliant on these informal networks.
Gilson’s findings suggest that enforcement capacity is a significant challenge in these settings. “Regions that depend most on informal providers often lack the ability to monitor and enforce regulations effectively, creating a dilemma that can hinder progress,” she explains. This insight is crucial for stakeholders in the water, sanitation, and drainage sector who are exploring potential partnerships and frameworks for improved service delivery.
The implications of this research extend beyond academic interest; they offer a roadmap for commercial entities looking to engage with both formal and informal water systems. By fostering partnerships that leverage the strengths of both sectors, companies can enhance their service offerings and create sustainable business models that address the pressing needs of underserved populations.
As the dialogue around achieving Sustainable Development Goal 6.1—universal access to safe and affordable drinking water—continues, this study serves as a critical reminder of the potential for co-produced water networks. The insights gleaned from Gilson’s research could shape future policy and operational strategies, ultimately leading to more resilient and equitable water systems across Sub-Saharan Africa.
For those in the water industry, this research underscores the importance of innovative collaboration. It invites further exploration into how coordinated efforts can not only improve access but also ensure the sustainability of water services in a region where the stakes are incredibly high.
