In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence, a new study published in the journal *Global Environmental Change Advances* (translated from the original title, *Advances in Global Environmental Change*) sheds light on a critical yet often overlooked aspect of AI’s growth: its environmental impact. Led by Apoorva Chouksey from the Division of Environmental Biotechnology, Genetics & Molecular Biology (EBGMB) at the ICMR-National Institute for Research in Environmental Health (NIREH) in Bhopal, India, the research highlights the sustainability paradox of AI, where the technology’s benefits come with significant ecological costs.
AI has become a cornerstone of modern advancements, driving innovations in disease diagnosis, renewable energy management, climate prediction, and biodiversity monitoring. However, the rapid development of larger AI models and the infrastructure supporting them has placed immense pressure on critical resources such as electricity, fresh water, and minerals. The study reveals that AI’s ecological footprint extends to carbon emissions, water use, supply chain impacts, and electronic waste.
“The environmental impact of AI is not just about the energy it consumes but also about the entire lifecycle of the technology, from the mining of raw materials to the disposal of electronic hardware,” explains Chouksey. This holistic view is crucial for understanding the true cost of AI’s environmental footprint.
One of the key findings of the study is that the current focus on improving efficiency alone will not be sufficient to mitigate AI’s environmental impact. The research emphasizes the need for a comprehensive approach that includes developing low-carbon data center infrastructure, implementing transparent and accessible reporting, utilizing environmentally responsible computing hardware, and adopting circular economy principles.
For the energy sector, these findings are particularly relevant. As AI continues to play a pivotal role in energy management and renewable energy integration, the sector must grapple with the environmental consequences of its own technological advancements. The study suggests that future developments in AI must prioritize sustainability to ensure long-term ecological viability.
“The energy sector is at a crossroads,” says Chouksey. “It can either continue down the path of rapid technological advancement with little regard for the environment or it can embrace a more sustainable approach that balances innovation with ecological responsibility.”
The study also highlights the challenges faced by current research on the ecological sustainability of AI, including fragmented data across disciplines. This fragmentation makes it difficult to gain a comprehensive understanding of AI’s environmental impact and develop effective mitigation strategies.
As the world continues to rely on AI for scientific discovery and environmental stewardship, the findings of this study serve as a wake-up call. They underscore the need for a collective effort involving technology, policy, and ethics to steer AI development towards long-term ecological sustainability. The future of AI is not predetermined, but it will ultimately be shaped by the choices we make today.
In the words of Chouksey, “The ecological future of AI is in our hands. It’s time to make choices that prioritize both innovation and sustainability.”

